[b]Composition:[/b] This is difficult really. It's always difficult to
critique someone's composition. The reason? Because the photographer would
not have taken the photo with the composition they did, if they didn't
believe this looked best to them. The worst thing about composition is that
it's really in the eye of the beholder. Photographic cliche is really what
has shaped what is and isn't acceptable composition. The best guidline for
this is the rule-of-thirds which I'm sure you are familiar with. And which
you know you didn't observe. Personally I don't like the thirds, but I do
like it almost thirds. I hope you understand what I mean. This isn't really
close to being thirds, not even enough to satisfy me. Always try to remember
that rule though, because it IS what causes us (the ones viewing) to
recognize what is a professional photo, and what isn't. [b]Creativity:[/b]
Nothing really creative here, other than the fact that the subject is
strange. [b]Subject:[/b] To be honest, I don't like flower photos. I don't
like critiqing them. But let us assume that you and I are trying to get a
good photo of this flower for a magazine article. [b]Technical:[/b] By your
comments, it seems that you didn't really pick the perfect weather, lighting
and background to photograph this flower. So I'll forgive the fact that it
should have been exposed a little better. If weather is not cooperating,
invest in an off-camera flash and diffuser. Believe me you will fall in love
with it's convenience and results. As far as depth of field is concerned, I
wouldn't have shot this so shallow. The reason is that the flower itself
becomes part of the background (blurred) and takes away from the effect of
the blue flower against a green background. If most of the flower and those
wonderful petals were in focus against the green, it would really make this
flower pop out and slap you! [b]Image Quality:[/b] Compression is not a
problem at all here, you obviously saved as a high quality jped. I would have
expected to see more compression sickness in the green background, but it's
not there. Gratz. This image could really use some sharpening. When images
are posted to the web or resized, they inherently loose some sharpness.
No ads here, because the site is supported by members. They make donations to keep the site running, and we give them as many nifty perks as we can think of.
For just $3 a month. You know you can pay more than that for a cup of coffee?!?!
Comments