Critique #1: "Red Gloves" by LosdaBear

TampaDan's picture
Submitted by TampaDan on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 3:05pm.

At first glance this photo is quite compelling and appealing. I particularly enjoy the pearls and the way the lighting has cast the shadows of the pearls. This gives the image some depth and adds sensuality. And the positioning of the fingers creates a nice composition. But after looking awhile something seems to be missing. The image seems “flat” and not as erotic or as sensuous as it could be.

The first thing that bothers me is the texture and fit of the gloves. They appear to be rather thick, suede-type gloves, kind of like my wife’s garden gloves. I think tight-fitting, smooth leather would be more sensual and appealing against a women’s bosom. Also, the color is not the shade of red I would relate with “erotic.” The overall effect of the gloves, for me, is too harsh a contrast that doesn’t quite fit the feeling that the image I think is trying to portray.

The second part that doesn’t quite work for me is the desaturation itself. I think I would have preferred if the woman and the pearls were not completely desaturated, but left with just a soft hint of skin color, and the gloves left at full saturation. That would still give the effect of contrast but with a little more sensuality. As such, the image lacks some warmth and attachment and seems a bit cold. Or, you could have gone with black gloves and kept it as a somewhat high-key B&W.

I really like how you cropped the image at the top, but I would like to see a slightly wider crop. Again, I think this would add to the eroticism and sensuality and draw the viewer in deeper.

Some of this is a matter of taste of course. We all have different views as to what is erotic. Although I do not know your intentions, I think it’s a great attempt at creating a sensual image with a bold, graphic style. If you were aiming at a more traditional erotic portrait however, it just misses the mark for me.

DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed within this critique do not represent anyone but the author…a complete stranger untrained in Art or Photography with no claim whatsoever of being an expert or even knowing what the hell he’s talking about. Feel free to disregard and ignore any and all opinions expressed in this critique.


zeedaam's picture

Submitted by zeedaam on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 3:27pm.

FYI the photo being critiqued is here


LosdaBear's picture

Submitted by LosdaBear on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 4:10pm.

Thatnks for the critique Tampa. I agree with you on most of what you're saying. This was the first time I have ever taken pictures of a woman without clothes on and I don't have real studio strobes and yada yada yada. Let's put it this way, it was dark, hot and cramped... At this point I am merely playing with it and seeing what happens. As you probably know, when you're nervous you can miss the fine details, like the weird pinky finger or the fit of the gloves. I was using little clip on halogen spots, not the best for photography in a dark room. Excuse? Yeah, it's all I have. I know more now than I did, next time will be better I hope. I was also using my 17-35mm which is not exactly the sharpest lens around. i would have preferred to use my 100mm or my 70-200mm. That expains the lack of detail in hte glove fabric. Personally I think I'm a much better photographer than this image would suggest, but I had fun playing with it.

Oh, Why didn't you put this as a comment with the photo itself?


zeedaam's picture

Submitted by zeedaam on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 4:44pm.

LosdaBear wrote:
At this point I am merely playing with it and seeing what happens.

?????


LosdaBear's picture

Submitted by LosdaBear on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 6:50pm.

In other words, I'm learning how to take pictures of nude people without screwing up and having some fun with the images in the mean time.


RebeccaBridges's picture

Submitted by RebeccaBridges on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 9:02pm.

O man - He HE! - The immature one has to step in and giggle at this comment "playing with it and seeing what happens" LOL! Sorry - but still gigglying!


LosdaBear's picture

Submitted by LosdaBear on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 9:36pm.

That's all I do... play... oh look at THAT!!! LOL Hmm


jimt's picture

Submitted by jimt on Tue, 2005/08/02 - 9:46pm.

Los photos and Becc's comments add some ZIP to this site..


RebeccaBridges's picture

Submitted by RebeccaBridges on Wed, 2005/08/03 - 1:28am.

Well - if I had what she had (which with enough duct tape I would), I would be doing the same thing Los! HeHe!


LosdaBear's picture

Submitted by LosdaBear on Wed, 2005/08/03 - 3:22am.

Lost me...


RebeccaBridges's picture

Submitted by RebeccaBridges on Wed, 2005/08/03 - 3:30am.

Well Los - mine are as big as hers..... but you - well see you take the duct tape and you get strategic with it and - well anywho - If I looked like her I would spend lots of time taking eroctic photos of myself saying "well look at that!" HE HE!


LosdaBear's picture

Submitted by LosdaBear on Wed, 2005/08/03 - 4:15am.

Well, use the duct tape... that could be interesting... LOL


RebeccaBridges's picture

Submitted by RebeccaBridges on Wed, 2005/08/03 - 5:08am.

It would look like some twisted erotic bondage photo by the time I was finished gettin those suckers duct taped to the original place nature had them in the first place - "comic relief erotic bondage self portrait" OMG LOL! Now im rollin on the floor - I might do it - just might do it HE HE!